I found it to be good due to it not being good.

Some of the acting and action was a bit off.

The subplot involving a possible divorce of the parents of two of the characters that was as quickly introduced as it was dropped added nothing to the film.

The soundtrack and the setting was nice.

The pacing was decent for the most part.
Some scenes felt as though they could have benefited from being shorter although it’s a minor complaint.

Some of the dialogue was incredibly cheesy.

Whilst a fair chunk of the film was predictable, it was still fun to watch.

There were a fair number of references to Jurassic Park as well as some objects from it that showed there was still a strong fondness for the setting.

My major complaint is that it was mostly a straightforward action film with minimal use of suspense and a bit of excess, but I guess that’s due to it being a different beast compared to Jurassic Park.

Actually, when I think about it, maybe it’s a brilliant film.

Jurassic Park was fascinating when it was released.
Partly due to my being a child, but also due to how amazing the dinosaurs looked and functioned.
It was very much like a grand discovery.

Of course science moves on but the film is still quite good.

In Jurassic World it is mentioned that genetic splicing was used to create a newer and more exciting dinosaur to keep people coming to the park.

This has to be a commentary on how people are continually wanting and expecting to be wowed more and more due to allowing themselves to be bored easily to the point that some things have to go beyond being ridiculous.

I suddenly feel this may be a brilliant film.

Wait… why does Chris Pratt have a house in the park?
Why does he have golf clubs and fishing rods?

AND WHERE THE HELL DID HE GET THAT COKE?!